Login Register

How do you feel about paying more for water?

By West Briton  |  Posted: August 24, 2013

Comments (5)

SOUTH West Water (SWW) has announced £850 million plans to improve Cornwall's water and sewerage services, but said it will mean higher bills.

Water treatment works in Falmouth and Bude will be upgraded, flood defences built at treatment work sites in Restormel, Drift and Falmouth, sewerage networks improved to protect the Fal Estuary shellfisheries, and sewers prone to blockages in Helston and Hayle tackled.

The company is asking for customers' views on its draft WaterFuture proposals before they are submitted to regulator Ofwat later this year.

In Falmouth, up to £10 million will be invested to upgrade the treatment process and equipment at College Water Treatment Works, which will be near the end of its working life after 2015. The upgrades will improve the disinfection process and minimise the risk of taste and discolouration issues in tap water.

The flood defence work at the site follows problems at Tewkesbury in 2007, when flooding resulted in the water supply to 100,000 people being cut off for three weeks.

SWW says the aim of the work is to "protect against the most extreme weather".

Work in the Fal Estuary will minimise pollution risk by improving the quality of effluent entering the water.

"We want to work closely with landowners, the Environment Agency and shellfisheries to pinpoint what and where the main risks are and act to minimise them," said a spokesman for the company.

"This would benefit the fisheries by allowing them to make better-informed decisions on when or when not to lift their crops and lessening the chance of financial loss.

"We have identified Helston as an area where parts of the sewerage network would benefit from being upgraded to prevent collapses, flooding and pollution in the future.

"We need to undertake detailed investigations before we can confirm exact timings, location and level of investment."

Currently SWW is recommending bill increases of about 2.5 per cent a year, an average of £68, between 2015 and 2020, the period over which the work is due to take place.

Customers already pay about £150 a year more than the national average and just two years ago faced an annual increase of 5 to 8 per cent.

Despite the Government rebate of £50, the average bill is expected to be £520 in 2014-15, hitting £588 by 2020 if the proposals go ahead.

Chief executive Chris Loughlin said: "We still need to invest in our networks.

"There are also new challenges to face including population growth, the likelihood of more extreme weather and higher bathing water standards from 2015.

"Our aim is to invest in the right things at the right time to improve our services and give the region the reliable 'always there' infrastructure it needs.

"In some areas, if we don't invest sooner rather than later we could end up facing much higher costs.

"We should be able to keep future increases below the rate of inflation."

Customers can comment on the proposals online at www.southwestwater.co.uk/waterfuture from now until September 14.

Read more from West Briton

Do you have something to say? Leave your comment here...

max 4000 characters


  • nbazzle  |  August 24 2013, 2:32PM

    :( bit heartbreaking really. There is no excuse for the rise (again) Apparently we're already paying a premium to SWW to keep our coast clean yet I can guarantee it isn't. Money being wasted really. Again.

    |   5
  • kernewekonan  |  August 24 2013, 12:49PM

    don,t ever trust a tory! these utilities were purposely sold off to their friends for them to make mega bucks which they certainly have by massively raising prices to fund their shareholders and executives payrole. and the punters keep on paying and paying. And now most of these companies are foreign owned, o! what a country this has become not a land fit for heroes just a land for the rich to get richer. Thatcherism and now Cameronism at its worse.

    |   6
  • leolegrande  |  August 24 2013, 12:00PM

    When ALL of these utilities were privatised under the last Tory government, we were told that "Private Investment" was needed because that was the only way to guarantee future supply and expansion. Over those many years, the money generated by these "Private Enterprise" is a vast amount. The majority of it being paid out to shareholders and executives. Very little of it has been set aside for future growth and development and now they are demanding that the end user pays. I do not agree with paying one extra penny, we were obviously lied to by the last Tory government and the present government are giving them a free hand to charge what they want. here's a far better plan, Renationalise all of the utilities, at least that way we can see what we are getting for the fortunes we pay to them and we can demand a better return for our money. Every year over 20,000 UK pensioners die from cold related illness. So tell me, how can Mr Smith at No 39 Acacia avenue sit at the breakfast table rubbing his hands at the increase in his Electricity shares whilst Mrs Brown his next door neighbour is carried out on a stretcher due to being to poor to have her heating on ? This is the Uk 2013, it makes me think we are still in the 1800's, absolutely disgusting and inhuman actions.

    |   9
  • Green Ginger Studios  |  August 24 2013, 10:44AM

    Appalling. South West Water, along with seemingly all the other privatised monopolies, are behaving as if they are "subscription" organisations and upping the subs to make improvements. Of course, if South West Water were a subscription organisation then the returns would have been reinvested within the organisation or returned to subscribers - rather than pumped out to shareholders.

    |   8
  • theferret11  |  August 24 2013, 8:41AM

    When I left Cornwall 6 years ago my water bill had risen to £850 per year.Here in Spain with a large swimming pool and a garden to water my bill this year was £260.I think the staff at SWW should wear masks.

    |   9