Login Register

Surfers Against Sewage raise "serious concerns" over coastal mining plans

By WBKatri  |  Posted: February 06, 2013

Surfers Against Sewage raise serious concerns over coastal mining plans

Surfers Against Sewage raise serious concerns over coastal mining plans

Comments (4)

A LEADING environmental campaign group has raised serious concerns over multi-million pound plans to begin mining the north Cornish coastline.

Marine Minerals Limited (MML) has submitted exploratory drilling plans on a stretch of coastline from St Ives to Perranporth to collect tin from the seabed.

The company said the £15 million scheme which would see the firm dredge as close as 200 meters from the shore could bring dozens of jobs to the county.

But Surfers Against Sewage (SAS) said the programme could create irreparable damage and could have a serious detrimental impact on surfing, tourism and fishing.

SAS campaign director Andy Cummins said he had  concerns over coastal processes, reanimating pollutants and flora and fauna.

He said: "Removing and replacing several millions of tonnes of sediment has the potential to disrupting the natural build-up of sediment, which plays a vital role in encouraging waves to break offshore, dissipating the majority of the wave's energy before the waves reach the shore.

"Premier surf spots along this coast rely on the build-up of sand which has had thousands of years to compact and it naturally moves inlands in the summer and outwards in the winter.

"When it is disturbed you loosen it creating pockets which  makes it unstable. We do not know how the sand will react or behave when it is returned and we could get powerful dumping waves which could significantly reduce the quality of surfing  and impair the beach experience for local residents and tourists."

Mr Cummins also said disrupting the sediment could reanimate pathogens associated with combined sewer overflow discharges and heavy metals used in mining.

It could also impact biodiversity in the area putting seals, sharks, dolphins and crustaceans  at risk.

Mr Cummins added: "The way this application must go ahead is that it has to look at the worst case scenario because we feel the cost and benefits are not on par with the thousands of jobs associated with surfing, fishing and tourism that could be negatively affected."

MML said that tin reserves were found at Ives Bay (14.71km2), Porthtowan (7.19 km2) and Perran (12.68km2).

In total the company proposes to extract around two million tonnes per year over a minimum of a ten year period.

Public consultation on the plans will close on Friday.

A petition against the dredging proposal can be found at www.protectourwaves.org.uk.

Do you have something to say? Leave your comment here...

max 4000 characters


  • BlueSkyGrif  |  February 21 2013, 2:25PM

    Poldice, I've read a lot of your comments and I think you need to broaden your knowledge. Most of your comments are from the dark ages and have no real bearing on the current time. Why not research a little deeper and remember what happened to Cornish mining and what state it left this county in.

    Rate 0
  • poldice  |  February 06 2013, 2:51PM

    The North coast of Cornwall is very exposed to winds and oceanic ground swell that create the waves that surfers seek, currently we are experiencing an extended period of heavy winter storms of phenomenal power that will shift millions of tons of substrate in a single tide churning everything into an abrasive sandy soup. Beach levels rise and fall in concert with the weather conditions, being entirely logical mans potential puny effort with a rustbucket sand dredger sifting for tin pales into less than insignificance. Another fact that so many choose to ignore is that historically all liquid mine waste ended up in the sea, after all thats how most of the tin got there and records show there were plent of fish and crustaceans around at that time, the material we are talking about occurs naturally, I suggest it is the man made chemicals such as bleach, detergents pesticides and fertiliser run off that have done and continue to do the most damage to the marine ecosystem.

    Rate   4
  • Trecurnow  |  February 06 2013, 2:09PM

    Couldn't agree more!

    Rate   -2
  • MaryJ75  |  February 06 2013, 1:18PM

    "It could also impact biodiversity in the area putting seals, sharks, dolphins and crustaceans at risk" There's no "could" about it. It WILL impact on biodiversity in the area. And it may create a few jobs, but it will also ruin many more. This is probably the worst proposal ever.

    Rate   1