Login Register

Councillor Collin Brewer did breach code of conduct for "grossly offensive" comments

By CG_News  |  Posted: July 08, 2013

CollinBrewer1

Collin Brewer

Comments (7)

A Cornwall councillor who said disabled children “should be put down” has been found guilty of breaching the councillors’ code of conduct – but cannot be suspended.

Wadebridge East member Collin Brewer’s comments were described by a panel investigating the claims as “outrageous and grossly offensive”.

Cornwall Council said it received 180 complaints about Mr Brewer following the revelation that he said disabled children should be put down as they cost the council too much – and a subsequent interview he gave to the Disability News Service after his re-election on May 2 where he likened disabled children to deformed lambs.

On Friday its findings were considered by the council’s standards committee in a behind-closed-doors session.

Related content

Although Mr Brewer has been found to be in breach of the Code of Conduct, the council does not have the legal power to remove him from his position as a councillor.

A council spokesman said: “The authority previously had the ability to suspend councillors following the investigation and determination of Code of Conduct complaints, however, following the Government’s changes to the Code of Conduct complaints process, this sanction is no longer available.”

The council said that “given the seriousness of the breach” the council’s monitoring has imposed the highest level of sanctions currently available to the council.

These include:

• Formally censuring Mr Brewer for the outrageous and grossly insensitive remarks he made in the telephone conversation with John Pring on May 8 and directing him to make a formal apology for the gross offensiveness of his comments and the significant distress they caused.

• A recommendation to the group that Mr Brewer should not be allocated a seat on any Council Committees that deal or might deal with issues relating to disabled children or other vulnerable members of the community and that he should be banned from access to Council premises or parts of premises where services to disabled children are provided, managed or commissioned.

• That Councillor Brewer is not nominated as the Council’s representative on any outside body that is involved with providing services or support to disabled children or other vulnerable members of the community.

• Mr Brewer will also be expected to attend further training on the Code of Conduct and in dealing with the media.

A council spokesman added: “We recognise the strength of feeling on this sensitive issue and share the frustrations of members of the public over the limited sanctions at our disposal. The monitoring officer has made it clear that if the powers had still been available to the council he would have either recommended that Mr Brewer be suspended or referred the matter to the First Tier Tribunal who would have had wider powers of sanction available to them.

“This view is supported by members of the Council’s Standards Committee who are recommending that the Council writes to the Department for Communities and Local Government and the Committee for Standards in Public Life expressing the Council’s concern over the removal of the authority’s power to impose meaningful sanctions in response to breaches of the Members’ Code of Conduct. This recommendation will be discussed at tomorrow’s meeting of the full Council.”

Read more from West Briton

Do you have something to say? Leave your comment here...

max 4000 characters

7 comments

  • Charlespk  |  July 09 2013, 9:29AM

    Far more dangerous are laws that try and silence opinion. http://tinyurl.com/72eju (open in a new window)

    |   2
  • DipStick  |  July 08 2013, 6:21PM

    """We desperately need legislation that specifically deals with hate crimes against disabled people - like the race hate law....""". Actually, we do not need ANY of these things. Freedom of speech means being able to say what you want, even if other people don't agree with it. The 'hate crimes' laws are just another way for the powers that be to exert power over us 'minions'. DS

    |   3
  • Charlespk  |  July 08 2013, 6:15PM

    "Sinister hangers on". . "Nazi ideals". That's Typical Facebook rhetoric Elizabeth Murfitt, from those who haven't even got the first clue about Nazi Germany or any of the events at the time.

    |   5
  • parahandy  |  July 08 2013, 6:02PM

    BradleyJJS, you are clearly an expert on these things what would you do? Good comment emurfitt, of at least change the law so Councillors who make these comments can be suspended!

    |   -4
  • DelBod  |  July 08 2013, 5:40PM

    BradleyJJJJJs, clearly you have not read the report which is freely available on the Council's website, there again with your bigoted and distorted opinions you clearly would not want to see the truth.

  • emurfitt  |  July 08 2013, 3:38PM

    Now that the facts have been established, is it too much to hope that Brewer's sinister hangers-on will stop defending his nazi ideals and keep their own council? We still have the police investigation to report, but if this is anything to go by, that will also be futile. We desperately need legislation that specifically deals with hate crimes against disabled people - like the race hate law. Brewer could then be charged with a criminal offence and dealt with appropriately.

    |   3
  • BradleyJJS  |  July 08 2013, 1:36PM

    Cornwall council is a Joke Politically Correctness gone mad, a decision based on gut feelings and intimidation from Facebook protestors not facts, how this helps anyone is the only question left to be answered. Outsource all of Cornwall to BT they can hardly make a worse job than these clowns. 1984 Orwell was right

      YOUR COMMENTS AWAITING MODERATION

       
       

      MORE NEWS HEADLINES